Los Angeles, CA +1 (213) 261-0385

The Effect of Sucrose Concentration on the Rate of Osmosis

Posted on Feb 15, 2024 by Danny

The Effect of Sucrose Concentration on the Rate of Osmosis

Potato and Carrot Slices Osmosis Lab Report

Are you looking for the best potato osmosis lab report help? You have come to the right place. Below is a full guide on how you can write your potato or carrot osmosis lab report.

Introduction

            The experiment aimed to explore the effect of sucrose solution concentration on the rate of osmosis in potato and carrot slices. The experiment used 5 different potato slices and 5 different carrot slices placed in a 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% concentrated sucrose solution. Each slice was named Red, Green, Blue, White and Yellow. The independent variable was the concentration of sucrose solution and the dependent variable was the change in mass.

Theory

            Osmosis is the movement of water particles from a low sugar concentration to a high sugar concentration through a semi-permeable membrane. Apart from sucrose solution concentration, other factors, such as temperature and the size of the particles affect the rate of osmosis. As the concentration of the sucrose solution is increased, the difference in mass of the potato/carrot increases. This is because the sucrose solution is a hypertonic solution indicating a high concentration of dissolved particles compared hypotonic solution with fewer dissolved particles. Besides, when a potato/carrot slice is placed in a solution with the same water potential, this is regarded as an isotonic solution. When a potato/carrot slice is placed in a concentrated sucrose solution that has a higher water potential, then, the water particles move from the potato/carrot slice to the solution. This results in a decrease in the final mass of the potato/carrot slice.

Hypothesis

            The hypothesis of this experiment is that (a) the mass of the potato/carrot slice will decrease when placed in sucrose solution with a higher water potential (hypertonic solution), (b) the mass of the potato/carrot slice will not change when placed in an isotonic solution and (c) the mass of the potato/carrot slice will increase when placed in a sucrose solution with lesser water potential (hypotonic solution).

Data Collection

Table 1: The Rate of Osmosis in a Potato Slice when placed in different concentrations of sucrose solution.

Sucrose concentration

Potato Initial Mass (g)

Potato Final Mass (g)

Red

Green

Blue

White

Yellow

Red

Green

Blue

White

Yellow

0%

Exp 1

3.32

3.11

2.95

2.96

2.97

3.81

3.65

3.41

3.17

3.38

Exp 2

2.87

3.06

3.03

2.88

3.03

3.34

3.52

3.50

3.30

3.55

25%

Exp 3

3.18

2.96

3.10

3.21

3.24

3.16

2.90

3.05

3.16

3.15

Exp 4

3.30

3.11

3.07

3.20

3.57

3.23

2.99

3.03

3.12

3.52

50%

Exp 5

2.91

2.89

3.22

2.79

3.09

2.36

2.38

2.49

2.17

2.49

Exp 6

3.10

3.41

2.83

2.91

2.84

2.41

2.60

2.12

2.21

2.24

75%

Exp 7

3.30

3.00

3.18

3.39

3.25

2.32

1.97

2.10

2.29

2.17

Exp 8

2.54

3.45

3.00

2.69

3.53

1.75

2.17

1.95

1.8

2.44

100%

Exp 9

2.70

2.89

2.49

2.60

2.66

1.81

1.90

1.56

1.51

1.63

Exp 10

2.82

3.33

3.09

3.47

2.80

1.80

2.30

2.02

2.08

2.01

 

Table 2: The Rate of Osmosis in a Carrot Slice when placed in different concentrations of sucrose solution.

Sucrose concentration

Carrot Initial Mass (g)

Carrot Final Mass (g)

Red

Green

Blue

White

Yellow

Red

Green

Blue

White

Yellow

0%

Exp 11

2.51

3.00

2.63

2.88

3.10

2.95

3.36

2.93

3.15

3.43

Exp 12

1.99

2.60

2.66

3.03

2.91

2.26

2.91

3.07

3.41

3.23

25%

Exp 13

3.54

3.71

3.54

3.28

3.37

3.37

3.79

3.65

3.32

3.40

Exp 14

3.30

3.42

2.86

3.22

2.79

3.30

3.48

2.92

3.31

2.92

50%

Exp 15

3.00

2.90

3.04

2.97

2.98

3.08

3.05

3.15

3.01

2.99

Exp 16

2.64

3.15

3.34

2.51

3.22

2.44

2.80

3.17

2.20

3.26

75%

Exp 17

3.98

3.32

3.58

3.40

3.53

3.41

2.83

2.88

2.91

2.90

Exp 18

2.98

2.99

2.69

3.72

2.90

2.40

2.36

2.28

2.91

2.29

100%

Exp 19

2.36

2.21

1.95

2.29

2.36

1.05

1.56

1.43

1.60

1.78

Exp 20

2.51

2.76

3.65

3.12

3.58

1.91

2.06

2.73

2.50

2.75

Data Processing

            This section processes the above-collected data. From the data collection results, both potato and carrot slices had different final masses compared to their initial mass. Hence, the change in mass can be calculated by subtracting the final mass from the initial mass. Besides, the percentage change in mass can be calculated by dividing the change in mass by the initial mass, then multiplying by 100. The average % change in mass will be calculated by adding the individual percentage changes in mass for Red, Green, Blue, White, and Yellow, then dividing it by 5.

Δ Mass = Final Mass – Initial Mass

Percentage Δ Mass = Δ Mass/Initial Mass * 100

The average percentage Δ mass = Total of % Δ mass for Red, Green, Blue, White, and Yellow/5.

Table 3: The change in mass and percentage change in mass for potato slices.

 

Red

Green

Blue

White

Yellow

 

Sucrose conc’n

Δ mass

% Δ mass

Δ mass

% Δ mass

Δ mass

% Δ mass

Δ mass

% Δ mass

Δ mass

% Δ mass

Average % change

0%

0.49

14.75

0.54

17.36

0.46

15.59

0.21

7.09

0.41

13.80

13.72

0.47

16.37

0.46

15.03

0.47

15.51

0.42

14.58

0.52

17.16

15.733

25%

-0.02

-0.62

-0.06

-2.02

-0.05

-1.61

-0.05

-1.55

-0.09

-2.77

-1.72

-0.07

-2.12

-0.12

-3.85

-0.04

-1.30

-0.08

-2.5

-0.05

-1.40

-2.24

50%

-0.55

-18.9

-0.51

-17.64

-0.73

-22.67

-0.62

-22.22

-0.6

-19.41

-20.17

-0.69

-22.25

-0.81

-23.75

-0.71

-25.08

-0.7

-24.05

-0.6

-21.12

-23.26

75%

-0.98

-29.69

-1.03

-34.33

-1.08

-33.96

-1.1

-32.44

-1.08

-33.23

-32.73

-0.79

-31.10

-1.28

-37.10

-1.05

-35

-0.89

-33.08

-1.09

-30.87

-33.43

100%

-0.89

-32.96

-0.99

-34.25

-0.93

-37.34

-1.09

-41.92

-1.03

-38.72

-37.04

-1.02

-36.17

-1.03

-30.93

-1.07

-34.62

-1.39

-40.05

-0.79

-28.21

-34

 

Table 4: The change in mass and percentage change in mass for carrot slices.

 

Red

Green

Blue

White

Yellow

 

Sucrose Conc’n

Δ mass

% Δ mass

Δ mass

% Δ mass

Δ mass

% Δ mass

Δ mass

% Δ mass

Δ mass

% Δ mass

Average % change

0%

0.44

17.53

0.36

12

0.3

11.41

0.27

9.38

0.33

10.65

12.19

0.27

13.57

0.31

11.92

0.41

15.41

0.38

12.54

0.32

11

12.89

25%

-0.17

-4.80

0.08

2.16

0.11

3.11

0.04

1.22

0.03

0.89

0.51

0

0

0.06

1.75

0.06

2.10

0.09

2.80

0.13

4.66

2.26

50%

0.08

2.67

0.15

5.17

0.11

3.62

0.04

1.35

0.01

0.34

2.63

-0.2

-7.58

-0.35

-11.11

-0.17

-5.09

-0.31

-12.35

0.04

1.24

-6.98

75%

-0.57

-14.32

-0.49

-14.76

-0.7

-19.55

-0.49

-14.41

-0.63

-17.85

-16.18

-0.58

-19.46

-0.63

-21.07

-0.41

-15.24

-0.81

-21.77

-0.61

-21.03

-19.72

100%

-1.31

-55.51

-0.65

-29.41

-0.52

-26.67

-0.69

-30.13

-0.58

-24.58

-33.26

-0.6

-23.90

-0.7

-25.36

-0.92

-25.21

-0.62

-19.87

-0.83

-23.18

-23.51

 

Table 5: Standard Deviation for each Average Percentage change for Potato Slices.

Sucrose conc’n

 

Average % change

Standard deviation (g)

0%

Exp. 1

13.72

3.929556

Exp. 2

15.733

1.038785

25%

Exp. 3

-1.72

0.781252

Exp. 4

-2.24

1.034894

50%

Exp. 5

-20.17

2.179977

Exp. 6

-23.26

1.563094

75%

Exp. 7

-32.73

1.845157

Exp. 8

-33.43

2.645407

100%

Exp. 9

-37.04

3.575653

Exp. 10

-34

4.60143

 

            From the standard deviation results, Exp. 3 can be regarded as the most accurate experiment for the potato slices since it has the lowest standard deviation of 0.781252.

 

Table 6: Standard Deviation for each Average Percentage change for Carrot Slices.

Sucrose conc’n

 

Average % change

Standard deviation (g)

0%

Exp. 11

12.19

3.141437

Exp. 12

12.89

1.693321

25%

Exp. 13

0.51

3.095343

Exp. 14

2.26

1.690663

50%

Exp. 15

2.63

1.894279

Exp. 16

-6.98

5.418538

75%

Exp. 17

-16.18

2.385162

Exp. 18

-19.72

2.640663

100%

Exp. 19

-33.26

12.63401

Exp. 20

-23.51

2.225071

 

            From the standard deviation results, Expt. 14 can be regarded as the most accurate experiment for the carrot slices since it has the lowest standard deviation of 1.690663.

Table 7: Average % change in mass for potato and carrot slices for each sucrose solution.

Sucrose Conc’n

Average % Mass (Potato)

Average % Mass (Carrot)

0%

14.7265

12.54

25%

-1.98

1.385

50%

-21.715

-2.175

75%

-33.08

-17.95

 

Graph 1: The effect of sucrose solution on the average percentage change in mass of potato and carrot slices.

 

Conclusion

            To conclude, it is evident that the percentage of sucrose concentration affects the rate of osmosis. The experiment used 5 different potato slices and 5 different carrot slices. The different slices were named Red, Green, Blue, White, and Yellow. Each of the slices was subjected to 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% concentrated sucrose solutions.

            The effect of sucrose solution on the rate of osmosis was cleary evident for 0%, and 100% concentrated sucrose solutions. For 0% concentrated sucrose solutions, the slices tended to gain more weight compared to 100% concentrated sucrose solutions where the slices lost weight. Besides, for 0% and 100% concentrated solutions, a substantial percentage change in mass was observed.

            These observations are in line with the osmosis principle that states that an increase in the concentration of sucrose solutions increases the water potential of the potato’s particles. As a result, water moves out of the potato particles towards the concentrated solution.

Evaluation

  • The different potato and carrot slices used could have a different amount of nutrition which would affect the rate of osmosis.
  • Sugar surrounding the slices might not be equally distributed resulting in different working scenarios for each slice.
  • The rate of osmosis could have been affected by the varying temperatures of the surroundings resulting in different results.

References

Phuntsho, S., Sahebi, S., Majeed, T., Lotfi, F., Kim, J. E., & Shon, H. K. (2013). Assessing the

major factors affecting the performances of forward osmosis and its implications on the desalination process. Chemical Engineering Journal231, 484-496.

Winfield, B. A. (1979). A study of the factors affecting the rate of fouling of reverse osmosis

membranes treating secondary sewage effluents. Water Research13(7), 565-569.

No tags added.

Testimonials

I will always be thankful for your services. You followed all the requirements of my criminology essay. My instructor never asked for any revision. Your essay writers are fantastic.

Read more

Alexander G

Alexander G

I was struggling with my GIS assignment, but this service came to the rescue! Their expert guidance and well-explained solutions made a complex subject feel manageable. Thank you for the support!

Read more

Emma L.

Emma L.

I was completely overwhelmed with my coursework and looming deadlines, unsure how I would manage everything on my own. Then I discovered CustomPapersWritingHelp, and my academic life changed for the better. The professional writers understood my requirements perfectly and delivered...

Read more

Sarah J

Sarah J

I never thought I'd say this, but I actually enjoyed working on my GIS assignment with their help. The tutors were patient, and their guidance made the subject less intimidating. I'm a happy student!

Read more

Sophie R.

Sophie R.

Read More Add Yours

Trustworthy Services

  • Get 24/7 assistance.
  • Get a masterpiece of work.
  • Step-by-step help.
  • We meet your expectations.
  • High-standard work.
  • Expert writing & editing.
  • Various discipline writers.
  • Academic documents help.
  • Scientific papers assistance.
  • Professional documents aid.

How it Works

  1. Place an order.
  2. Make payment.
  3. Receive payment confirmation via email.
  4. The order is assigned to a writer.
  5. The writer delivers the first draft to an editor.
  6. The editor reviews the draft and requests changes.
  7. The writer makes changes and delivers the final draft.
  8. The final draft is delivered to you via email.
  9. Review the draft and request a revision within 1 month for free (very rare).

Any concerns? Contact Us or join our Live Customer Support platform.

Our Writers are Qualified

  • Native English speakers
  • Undergraduate, Master or PhD certified

Our Papers are Professional

  • Plagiarism free (original)
  • Correct referencing (APA, Harvard, MLA, etc.)
  • Use of graphics/ pictures/ images
  • Correct grammar
  • No typos

Get these Services for Free

  • Title page
  • Reference list
  • Turnitin report

NB: Custom Papers Writing Help provides custom writing services for research and study assistance purposes only. Our uniquely created reports are meant to help students with the necessary guidelines for their academic coursework tasks.

 

×
Access Type: front
Page [18]
Module: /home1/thesisd1/public_html/custompaperswritinghelp/plugins/personal_blog/index.php
Language: en
Identity: NULL

URL Params [1]
Blocks List [10]
Installed Packages Empty array
Configuration Params [255]
Constants List [27]
Initialized Classes List [24]

$_POST Empty array
$_FILES Empty array
$_GET Empty array

PHP version: 7.2.34
$_SERVER [59]
$_SESSION [1]
$_COOKIE Empty array
Info [blog]
×
Hooks loaded, but weren't executed [10]

Hooks List

1phpphpCoreUrlRewrite
2phpinit
3phpphpCoreBeforeAuth
4phpphpCoreBeforePageDefine
5phpphpCoreDefineAfterGetPages
6php
(1) phpSmartyAfterFuncInit [1]
7phpphpSmartyAfterMediaInit
8php
(1) bootstrap [1]
9phpphpCoreSmartyAfterBlockGenerated
10phpphpCoreCodeBeforeStart
11php
(1) phpCoreCodeAfterAll [1]
12phpphpCoreBeforeJsCache
13php
(5) phpCoreBeforePageDisplay [1]
14php
(1) phpCoreDisplayBeforeShowBody [1]
15smarty
(1) smartyFrontBeforeHeadSection [1]
16smarty
(2) smartyFrontAfterHeadSection [1]
17smartysmartyFrontBeforeBreadcrumb
18smartysmartyFrontBeforeNotifications
19smartysmartyFrontBeforeMainContent
20smartysmartyFrontAfterMainContent
21smartysmartyFrontBeforeFooterLinks
22smartysmartyFrontAfterFooterLinks
23smarty
(1) smartyFrontFinalize [1]
24phpfinalize
Hooks [26/24]
×
#TimeQuery
1.0.11 ms
SET NAMES 'utf8'
2.1.21 ms
SELECT `code`, `id`, `title`, `locale`, `date_format`, `direction`, `master`, `d ...
3.0.19 ms
SET time_zone = '-8:00'
4.26.51 ms
SELECT `key`, `value` FROM `CP_language` WHERE `code` = 'en' AND `category` NOT ...
5.1.9 ms
SELECT `name`, `code`, `type`, `extras`, `filename`, `pages` FROM `CP_hooks` WH ...
6.0.79 ms
SELECT `type`, `name`, `value` FROM `CP_config_custom` WHERE (`type` = 'group' ...
7.2.58 ms
SELECT p.`id`, e.`type`, e.`url`, p.`name`, p.`alias`, p.`action`, p.`extras`, p ...
8.0.21 ms
SELECT `name`, `url`, `title` FROM `CP_extras` WHERE `type` = 'package' AND `st ...
9.1.26 ms
SELECT `block_id`, `slider` 
   FROM `CP_banners_block_options`
10.0.11 ms
SELECT `block_id`, `amount_displayed` FROM `CP_banners_block_options`
11.1.03 ms
SELECT * FROM `CP_banners` WHERE `status` = 'active'
12.1.78 ms
SELECT * FROM `CP_testimonials` WHERE `status` = 'active' AND `lang` = 'en' AND ...
13.0.68 ms
SELECT `name`, `alias` 
   FROM `CP_pages`
14.0.94 ms
SELECT `name`, `menu`, `movable` 
   FROM `CP_positions`
15.1.4 ms
SELECT `object` `name`, `access` FROM `CP_objects_pages` WHERE (`object_type` = ...
16.6.99 ms
SELECT * FROM `CP_blocks` WHERE `status` = 'active' AND `extras` IN ('', 'kcapt ...
17.2.52 ms
SELECT `object` FROM `CP_objects_pages` WHERE `object_type` = 'blocks' && `page ...
18.1.45 ms
SELECT * 
   FROM `CP_acl_objects`
19.1.36 ms
SELECT * FROM `CP_acl_privileges` WHERE (`type` = 'user' AND `type_id` = '0') O ...
20.0.58 ms
SELECT `alias`, `custom_url`, `name` FROM `CP_pages` WHERE `status` = 'active' ...
21.0.96 ms
SELECT m.*, p.`nofollow`, p.`new_window`, p.`action`, p.`custom_url` FROM `CP_me ...
22.0.44 ms
SELECT `name`, `parent` 
   FROM `CP_pages`
23.1.92 ms
SELECT m.*, p.`nofollow`, p.`new_window`, p.`action`, p.`custom_url` FROM `CP_me ...
24.0.31 ms
SELECT m.*, p.`nofollow`, p.`new_window`, p.`action`, p.`custom_url` FROM `CP_me ...
25.5.51 ms
SELECT b.`id`, b.`title`, b.`date_added`, b.`body`, b.`alias`, b.`image`, m.`ful ...
26.2.34 ms
SELECT DISTINCT bt.`title`, bt.`alias` FROM `CP_blog_tags` bt LEFT JOIN `CP_blog ...
27.2.73 ms
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM `CP_online` WHERE `session_id` = 'efe1ecfba5c34a00ffc7ebe7 ...
28.1.7 ms
INSERT INTO `CP_online` SET `status` = 'active', `page` = 'https://custompapersw ...
29.1.01 ms
SELECT * FROM `CP_slider` WHERE `status` = 'active'
30.1.11 ms
SELECT * FROM `CP_slider_block_options` WHERE 1 = 1
31.1.07 ms
SELECT t1.*, t2.`username` `username`, IF (t1.`member_id` > 0, IF (t2.`fullname` ...
32.0.07 ms
SELECT FOUND_ROWS()
33.0.16 msDUPLICATED
SELECT `type`, `name`, `value` FROM `CP_config_custom` WHERE (`type` = 'group' ...
34.0.33 ms
SELECT `name`, `type` FROM `CP_extras` WHERE `status` = 'active'
Sql [Queries: 34]
×
Real time render: 0.31288
Math time render: 0.31171
Memory usage: 6.00Mb(6 291 456b)
2. class - Loading class iaDb
Rendering time: 6.64 ms (0.00664 s)
Memory usage: 2.00Mb (2 097 152)
3. class - Loading class iaSanitize
Rendering time: 6.36 ms (0.013 s)
Memory usage: 2.00Mb (2 097 152)
4. class - Loading class iaValidate
Rendering time: 0.85 ms (0.01385 s)
Memory usage: 2.00Mb (2 097 152)
5. class - Loading class iaLanguage
Rendering time: 0.63 ms (0.01448 s)
Memory usage: 2.00Mb (2 097 152)
6. class - Loading class iaUsers
Rendering time: 2.22 ms (0.0167 s)
Memory usage: 2.00Mb (2 097 152)
7. class - Loading class iaView
Rendering time: 3.2 ms (0.0199 s)
Memory usage: 2.00Mb (2 097 152)
8. class - Loading class iaCache
Rendering time: 5.82 ms (0.02572 s)
Memory usage: 2.00Mb (2 097 152)
9. core - Basic Classes Initialized
Rendering time: 1.59 ms (0.02731 s)
Memory usage: 2.00Mb (2 097 152)
10. config - Cached Configuration Loaded
Rendering time: 1 ms (0.02831 s)
Memory usage: 2.00Mb (2 097 152)
11. core - Configuration Loaded
Rendering time: 3.28 ms (0.03159 s)
Memory usage: 2.00Mb (2 097 152)
12. core - Hooks Loaded
memory up: 50%
Rendering time: 30.47 ms (0.06206 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
13. class - Loading class iaUtil
Rendering time: 0.11 ms (0.06217 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
14. class - Loading class iaSmarty
Rendering time: 6.07 ms (0.06824 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
15. main - beforeSmartyFuncInit
Rendering time: 23.46 ms (0.0917 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
18. END TIME phpSmartyAfterFuncInit banners
Rendering time: 6.76 ms (0.09846 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
22. END TIME bootstrap testimonials
Rendering time: 1.95 ms (0.10041 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
24. class - Loading class iaPage
Rendering time: 1.03 ms (0.10144 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
25. class - Loading class iaAcl
Rendering time: 13.74 ms (0.11518 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
26. hook - phpCoreCodeAfterAll
Rendering time: 26.48 ms (0.14166 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
27. hook - phpCoreBeforePageDisplay
Rendering time: 6.25 ms (0.14791 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
28. START TIME phpCoreBeforePageDisplay reviews
Rendering time: 0.99 ms (0.1489 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
29. END TIME phpCoreBeforePageDisplay reviews
Rendering time: 0.11 ms (0.14901 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
31. END TIME phpCoreBeforePageDisplay slider
Rendering time: 6.32 ms (0.15533 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
32. class - Loading class iaItem
Rendering time: 1.11 ms (0.15644 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
33. hook - phpCoreDisplayBeforeShowBody
Rendering time: 5.43 ms (0.16187 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
35. END TIME phpCoreDisplayBeforeShowBody privatemessages
Rendering time: 2.47 ms (0.16434 s)
Memory usage: 4.00Mb (4 194 304)
36. smarty - smartyFrontBeforeHeadSection
memory up: 34%
Rendering time: 69.4 ms (0.23374 s)
Memory usage: 6.00Mb (6 291 456)
37. smarty - smartyFrontAfterHeadSection
Rendering time: 7.54 ms (0.24128 s)
Memory usage: 6.00Mb (6 291 456)
38. smarty - smartyFrontBeforeBreadcrumb
Rendering time: 40.67 ms (0.28195 s)
Memory usage: 6.00Mb (6 291 456)
39. smarty - smartyFrontBeforeNotifications
Rendering time: 19.89 ms (0.30184 s)
Memory usage: 6.00Mb (6 291 456)
40. smarty - smartyFrontBeforeMainContent
Rendering time: 2.07 ms (0.30391 s)
Memory usage: 6.00Mb (6 291 456)
42. smarty - smartyFrontBeforeFooterLinks
Rendering time: 7.8 ms (0.31171 s)
Memory usage: 6.00Mb (6 291 456)
Timer [Time: 0.31288] [Mem.: 6.00Mb]
×
Warning: Declaration of iaMailbox::getMessage($messageId) should be compatible with abstractCore::getMessage()
in file plugins/privatemessages/includes/classes/ia.front.mailbox.php
Backtrace26645 [8]
 
Unknown error type [8192]: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls
on line 75 in file includes/smarty/sysplugins/smarty_internal_compilebase.php
Backtrace85499 [15]
 
Error [2]
×
includes/classes/ia.core.smarty.php on line [341]39351
Notice:
Lateness resource inclusion: //custompaperswritinghelp.com/plugins/testimonials/templates/front/css/style.css?fm=1590510938
Debug [1]